javascript hit counter
Business, Financial News, U.S and International Breaking News

Trump lawyer, high authorized specialists react to indictment: ‘The rule of legislation has died’

Former President Donald Trump’s lawyer Joe Tacopina declared the American rule of legislation institutionally lifeless Thursday after New York County DA Alvin Bragg introduced ahead an indictment regarding the Stormy Daniels NDA case.

Tacopina advised “Hannity” he has by no means been extra incensed in his authorized profession, throughout which he famous he has been on either side of indictments.

“I’ve by no means been extra indignant a few cost as a result of as we speak the rule of legislation in america of America died. It is lifeless. And it is one thing that I by no means thought I would see. I’ve goosebumps even saying it as a result of I do not be ok with saying it,” Tacopina mentioned.

Tacopina warned that Bragg “stretched” the legislation in opposition to a rival particular person in a approach that makes for a precedent that might be laborious to undo for future instances.

Trump was “shocked” by the indictment — which reviews mentioned may tally as many as 34 counts — Tacopina mentioned, including that what has occurred to his shopper is paying homage to the Soviet customized of “you decide the goal — the individual you do not like… and then you definitely discover the crime.”


“It by no means was that approach in america. It is not speculated to be that approach, and after we begin doing that, we’re no higher than these different horrific, horrific dictatorships and governments that abused rule of legislation.”

Even “unpopular” Americans over time have benefited from the rule of legislation, whereas Bragg has flipped that customized on its head, he added. 

“There isn’t any crime,” he mentioned, later including that he would virtually “pay” his shopper to be the one to cross-examine star prosecution witness Michael Cohen, the mogul’s former “fixer,” describing the convicted counsel as a pathological liar who has contradicted himself many instances.

“There isn’t any one that might ever persuade me that this man was not simply charged to have an effect on the elections… and that is scary to me,” Tacopina concluded.

Harvard Regulation Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz additionally analyzed the indictment on “Hannity,” echoing critiques of Bragg as being a politically motivated prosecutor who “intentionally violated the statute of limitation” in Trump’s case.


Bragg had seven years to indict Trump, however waited after which did so when the defendant was out of state — on this case, Florida — which the professor mentioned proves New York County may have indicted him any time.

“Additionally, once you’re a Democratic-elected prosecutor who ran on the marketing campaign pledge of getting Trump and you are going to indict… the person who could develop into the longer term president if he beats the incumbent, who’s the pinnacle of your political get together, prosecutor — you higher have the strongest case possible,” Dershowitz mentioned. 

“… Not a case that will depend on stitching collectively two inapplicable statutes and utilizing Michael Cohen.”

Dershowitz mentioned that regardless of the flimsiness of Bragg’s case, given Cohen’s potential because the star witness, he would suggest submitting for a change in venue to neighboring Richmond County, N.Y., to present either side a good shake.

Fox Information authorized analyst Gregg Jarrett later opined that Tacopina may be proper in his prediction to “humiliate Alvin Bragg” in court docket, calling up Bragg’s “convoluted authorized concept [he] has merely dreamed up [in] taking a misdemeanor and supercharging it right into a felony.”

“The legislation does not assist that, and I might predict that Tacopina and his co-counsel will instantly file a movement to dismiss as a result of the legislation does not assist the cost, and the alleged information do not assist against the law acknowledged by the legislation.”


Jarrett famous the Federal Election Fee didn’t view Trump’s actions within the case as against the law, and that different ranges of the judiciary have punted on prosecuting Trump, together with Bragg’s predecessor Cy Vance Jr.

“This can be a DA who has disgracefully abused his energy and determined to criminalize politics, and it’s a severe breach of his moral obligation to see that justice is completed pretty and equitably. On this case, it isn’t.”

George Washington College legislation professor Jonathan Turley identified that former Bragg prosecutor Mark Pomerantz wrote a guide — “Folks vs. Donald Trump” — concerning the investigation. Pomerantz reportedly initially resigned over Bragg’s reluctance to prosecute the previous president.

“[O]ne of [the two resigned prosecutors] did one thing that I believe is deeply unprofessional: He wrote a guide about an individual who wasn’t even charged, not to mention convicted, who remains to be below investigation,” he mentioned.

“[He] had this public marketing campaign to power Bragg to indict him. I believed it was a breathtakingly unprofessional factor to do, however that is what has characterised this case from the outset.” 

This text was initially revealed by Learn the original article here.

Comments are closed.