javascript hit counter
Business, Financial News, U.S and International Breaking News

Trump indictment ignites blended response on Twitter: From ‘formally a joke’ to ‘Completely satisfied Trumpmas’

The information that former President Donald Trump was indicted by a grand jury on Thursday drew intense media reactions from each side of the aisle on Twitter.

The fees got here after Manhattan District Lawyer Alvin Bragg launched an investigation into hush cash funds made previous to the 2016 presidential election to grownup movie actress Stormy Daniels and Playboy mannequin Karen McDougal.

This announcement marks Trump as the primary president, present or former, to be indicted.

Each conservative and liberal media personalities had blended reactions to the report, with left-wing customers largely praising the information whereas conservatives blasted the announcement.


Self-described “award-winning multimedia journalist” David Leavitt equally wrote, “Completely satisfied Trump Indictment Day for all who have fun it.”

“Merry Trumpmas,” former MSNBC anchor Keith Olbermann celebrated.

“March 30, 2023. Mark this present day in historical past,” MSNBC contributor Eric Feigl-Ding wrote.

MSNBC anchor Lawrence O’Donnell joked, “It’s a new season in NYC. The skating rink is gone and the Trump INDICTMENT is right here.”

“Hallelujah!” The View co-host Ana Navarro cheered.

Washington Submit columnist Max Boot was extra circumspect, tweeting, “I confess to being skeptical of this case. Trump ought to be indicted for making an attempt to steal the election and fomenting a coup, not for paying off Stormy Daniels. There’s a worrying potential for this indictment to backfire. However let’s respect the method and let the case play out.”

Some on the appropriate noticed the indictment as a political win for Trump.

“Democrats simply quick tracked Donald Trump again to the White Home,” radio host Erick Erickson remarked.

The Lafayette Co. president Ellen Carmichael agreed, “Reminder: Democrats suppose Donald Trump is extremely harmful but additionally wish to run in opposition to him in 2024.”

Fox Information contributor Joe Concha blasted the case writing, “During which a ham sandwich will get indicted by way of a clumsy Manhattan DA who resurrected a zombie case nobody else would contact, and the ham sandwich finally wins when the case will get laughed out of courtroom. Our ‘authorized system’ is formally a joke.”

“Now that Trump’s been indicted, anticipate complaints of ‘whataboutism’ to abruptly be in vogue once more. As a result of no matter you concentrate on his guilt or innocence right here, doing this to Trump relative to what different pols have gotten away with is fairly stunning,” RealClearInvestigations senior author Mark Hemingway predicted.

Nationwide Overview senior author Dan McLaughlin tweeted, “Bragg actually refuses to implement complete areas of the legislation, so he is the worst attainable consultant for the argument that every one attainable crimes ought to all the time be prosecuted. (And that is apart for a way the legislation must be bent to make this a state-law crime.)”

“Amongst most disingenuous tps is ‘nobody is above the legislation. A POTUS present or former has by no means been indicted within the historical past of the nation. This radical leftist DA who would not prosecute ANYONE whereas NY returns to unhealthy outdated days contrives a case even Trump-hating feds would not make,” The Federalist senior contributor Benjamin Weingarten tweeted.


The Washington Submit’s editorial board additionally rapidly revealed a chunk, titled “The Trump indictment is a poor take a look at case for prosecuting a former president.”

“Donald Trump deserves the authorized scrutiny he’s getting — which has come from many corners on many counts. But of the lengthy listing of alleged violations, the possible costs on which a grand jury in New York state voted to indict him this week are maybe the least compelling. There’s trigger for concern, and warning, forward,” the article learn.

The New York Occasions editorial board adopted swimsuit with a extra important piece, titled “Even Donald Trump Ought to Be Held Accountable.”


“The choice to prosecute a former president is a solemn activity, significantly given the deep nationwide fissures that Mr. Trump will inevitably exacerbate because the 2024 marketing campaign grows nearer. However the price of failing to hunt justice in opposition to a pacesetter who might have dedicated these crimes could be increased nonetheless,” the NYT editorial board wrote.

The indictment in opposition to Trump at the moment stays sealed, although Bragg had beforehand been investigating Trump for attainable fraud and marketing campaign finance violations.

This text was initially revealed by Learn the original article here.

Comments are closed.