javascript hit counter
Business, Financial News, U.S and International Breaking News

Kabul after the bombings: Blaming the media isn’t working

The outstanding factor in regards to the massively essential protection of President Biden’s Afghanistan catastrophe is that it spanned the political spectrum from liberal to conservative shops.

Nearly everybody, together with veteran warfare correspondents and Pentagon reporters, blamed the administration for its gorgeous misjudgments within the U.S. withdrawal, contradictory statements and shaky begin in evacuating these whose lives are threatened.

Nicely, that was then. Greater than per week after the autumn of Kabul, some left-wing commentators are mounting a protection of Biden that goes one thing like this:

It wasn’t his fault.

It was Trump’s fault.

Issues aren’t as unhealthy as they appear.

Truly, they’re going remarkably properly.

This isn’t actually altering the general public notion that the Biden administration owns this debacle, as mirrored by the president’s sinking ballot numbers. Nevertheless it means that some precincts of the media are reverting to their typical partisan type, attempting to place the very best face on an terrible scenario. Such makes an attempt will presumably be shaken by Thursday’s terror bombings on the Kabul airport, and the threats which have slowed the speed of evacuations for Individuals and our Afghan allies.


What has fueled the unfavourable protection, for my part, is not only the deteriorating scenario however the upbeat assessments by the president, his secretary of state and different high officers which can be flatly contradicted by the cruel realities in Afghanistan. If journalism doesn’t fact-check these rosy eventualities, how is it of any use to anybody?

Every part’s protected on the airport, they stated, till it wasn’t. There’s no drawback getting on these flights, they stated, till some planes have been taking off almost empty. Individuals aren’t stranded there, they stated — however how else might the present scenario be described?

There is no such thing as a query that Biden inherited a horrible scenario with no good decisions, and has evacuated greater than 100,000 folks. However he and his staff made spectacular miscalculations in assuming the Afghan authorities and navy might cling on for greater than 11 days, and in delaying evacuations and giving up our air base.

The brand new line of liberal protection comes from individuals who could be shouting from the rooftops if all this had gone down whereas Donald Trump was president. (Sure, regardless of some stabs at revisionist historical past, the previous president set the withdrawal in movement, launched 5,000 Taliban prisoners and diminished many of the American navy presence.)

Apparently, the failure has been manufactured by biased journalists, not less than in keeping with New York journal. “Joe Biden’s withdrawal from Afghanistan has been a ‘disastrous’ and ‘humiliating’ ‘fiasco,’ within the phrases of the mainstream media’s ostensibly goal foreign-policy journalists,” the journal says. “But this political fiasco is just not a growth that the media lined a lot as one which it created.”

Nothing to see right here: Every part is continuing with “comparatively little chaos.”


Yeah, inform that to the 1,500 Individuals (by official estimate) who haven’t gotten out but, or the maybe a whole lot of hundreds of Afghan interpreters, safety folks and others who aided our 20-year warfare and whose households at the moment are in peril.

The author, Eric Levitz, admits he’s very liberal — what with discuss “George W. Bush’s warfare crimes and studying Noam Chomsky’s lectures” — so he casts Biden as having made only some errors. However he unloads on correspondents for NBC, CBS, CNN and The New York Occasions for having “brazenly editorialized” towards White Home coverage and “assigned Biden near-total accountability” for the debacle.

Truly, the protection has been way more nuanced than he permits. And probably the most stinging evaluation comes from correspondents who know the navy and the area and don’t have any political ax to grind.

When NBC’s Richard Engel calls the collapse a “second of American humiliation” that shall be seen darkly by historical past, he’s proper.

When Fox Information’ Jennifer Griffin says of the Afghans being left behind that “we didn’t maintain our promise and it’s a nationwide disgrace,” she’s proper.

When CNN’s Clarissa Ward says from the airport that she hasn’t seen a single U.S. aircraft take off for eight hours, she is reporting what she sees — and there have been instances, resembling final Saturday, when the flights merely stopped.

So why would a press corps that had been largely favorable to Joe Biden — particularly in distinction to Donald Trump — out of the blue activate him?

For Levitz, it’s an “imperial” sense that “assumes the U.S. can and may exert decisive affect over international occasions.” However right here he’s conflating two totally different issues.


Whereas there are actually pro-war voices within the media — from pro-Iraq neoconservatives to retired generals — the journalistic consensus is that Biden’s determination to go away Afghanistan was each in style and overdue. Few have been arguing that we must always have stayed and fought that warfare ceaselessly; the press had largely stopped overlaying it. It’s the execution — and the twenty years of deceptive assurances about progress there — that have been at difficulty.

On the identical time, skilled journalists warned {that a} Taliban takeover — which might reestablish Afghanistan as a terrorist haven — was in all probability inevitable. Biden referred to as it “extremely unlikely.” And whereas we will debate whether or not leaving a couple of thousand troops there made extra sense, the journalists have been proper.

Throughout Thursday night time’s information convention, the president informed “probably the most attention-grabbing man within the press” — Fox Information’ Peter Doocy — that he takes accountability for the day’s casualties and vowed to search out the accountable terrorists. He stated Trump had left him with an untenable scenario, however finally didn’t cross the buck.

So the real-world influence of the Afghan collapse is just not a media creation. It’s a international tragedy for which the media are merely the messengers.


Comments are closed.