Garland refuses to look at civil rights claims of Jan. 6 defendants: ‘I don’t know something’

Lawyer Basic Merrick Garland on Wednesday declined a request to look at whether or not the civil rights of some Jan. 6 defendants have been violated as a result of lack of a speedy trial and mentioned it is the job of their attorneys to make that argument in court docket.

At a Home Appropriations subcommittee listening to, Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., mentioned he toured the D.C. Division of Corrections final week and met with a number of the 20 prisoners nonetheless being held due to their participation within the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol Hill riot. Clyde argued that detaining these individuals for therefore lengthy violates the sixth Modification to the Structure, which ensures the precise to a “speedy and public trial.”

“You’re employed to uphold the civil rights of all Individuals,” Clyde added. “I feel on this case, their civil rights are being violated, and I might recognize you trying into that.”

TOP FBI OFFICIAL DODGES WHEN CRUZ ASKS IF AGENTS PARTICIPATED IN JAN. 6 RIOT

A report from Simply Safety this month mentioned 11 of the 20 being held haven’t accepted a plea settlement and haven’t been dropped at trial, whereas the opposite 9 have been convicted or have pleaded responsible.

However Garland didn’t decide to inspecting the defendants’ circumstances, and as an alternative argued that their attorneys have the precise to argue earlier than a decide that their sixth Modification rights have been violated.

GOP SENATORS PUSH BACK AS DOJ ROLLS OUT EXPANDED DOMESTIC TERRORISM UNIT DUE TO JAN. 6 RIOT

“I don’t know the specifics of particular person circumstances,” Garland mentioned. “The great thing about the sixth Modification is that every of these individuals is entitled to a lawyer, has a lawyer who could make a speedy trial argument within the court docket.”

“Oftentimes attorneys ask for extra time, oftentimes they ask for exceptions for discovery,” Garland added. “There was an unlimited quantity of discovery in these circumstances. However I don’t know something about these specific circumstances.”

When Clyde requested whether or not a two-year wait meets the “speedy trial” clause of the sixth Modification, Garland replied, “It might probably if the exceptions to the Speedy Trial Act are met. These are the accountability of the attorneys for these defendants.”

“I would love you to look into that, as a result of to me, I don’t assume ready two years to your trial complies with the sixth Modification of the Structure,” Clyde mentioned.

TWO YEARS LATER: AN OVERVIEW OF JAN. 6 AND WHAT TOOK PLACE AFTER

“That is an argument to be made earlier than the decide,” Garland replied. “The decide has the authority to dismiss a case for a violation of the Speedy Trial Act.”

A number of Home Republicans met with the Jan. 6 defendants within the Washington, D.C. jail final week, together with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., who mentioned after her go to that the rights of the prisoners have been ignored.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Their due course of rights are being violated and so they have been mistreated and handled as political prisoners,” she mentioned.

This text was initially revealed by foxnews.com. Learn the original article here.