Environmentalists protesting outdoors Amazon’s shareholder assembly
Paayal Zaveri | CNBC
The Nationwide Labor Relations Board will maintain a listening to on Sept. 28 to evaluation prices that Amazon illegally retaliated towards two of its most outspoken inside critics when it fired them final yr, according to a filing.
Amazon fired Emily Cunningham and Maren Costa, each of whom had been consumer expertise designers on the firm’s Seattle headquarters, for “repeatedly violating inside insurance policies” in April of 2020. Cunningham and Costa stated they had been fired in retaliation for his or her continued criticism of Amazon’s local weather insurance policies and labor practices.
The NLRB in April found merit to Cunningham and Costa’s unfair labor observe grievance, which was filed final October. Of their grievance to the NLRB, Cunningham and Costa alleged Amazon violated federal labor legislation by firing them “based mostly on discriminatory enforcement of its non-solicitation and communication insurance policies,” the latter of which prohibits workers from talking about Amazon’s enterprise with out supervisor approval.
These insurance policies additionally had the impact of chilling and restraining workers’ proper to interact in actions protected by federal labor legal guidelines, they argued.
In Could, the NLRB’s Seattle regional workplace issued a grievance in Cunningham and Costa’s case. The grievance will now be heard by an administrative legislation choose in a digital listening to scheduled for Sept. 28.
A spokesperson for the NLRB confirmed the listening to to CNBC, however declined to remark additional on the case. Cunningham declined to remark. Costa did not reply to a request for remark.
Representatives from Amazon did not reply to a request for remark. The corporate previously said it disagreed with the NLRB’s resolution, noting that it agrees with workers’ proper to talk out, however “that doesn’t include blanket immunity towards our inside insurance policies, all of that are lawful.”
Amazon might nonetheless attain a settlement with Cunningham and Costa earlier than the listening to or in the course of the trial. If the trial proceeds, both occasion can enchantment the choose’s ruling to the NLRB board in Washington.
Amazon has confronted a rising variety of complaints from workers who allege the corporate retaliated towards them for talking out. The amount of complaints has reached a excessive sufficient degree that the NLRB is contemplating consolidating its efforts right into a nationwide investigation, NBC News reported in March.
The coronavirus pandemic has generated a rising push amongst Amazon warehouse and supply staff to advocate for higher working situations, resulting in a collection of actions like protests and organizing makes an attempt. On the similar time, an growing variety of workers has filed complaints with the NLRB, a lot of which allege unfair labor practices.
Amazon not too long ago settled with Jonathan Bailey, an Amazon worker who led a walkout over Covid-19 considerations at a warehouse in Queens, New York, and later accused the corporate of violating federal labor legislation when it interrogated him following the walkout, in accordance with The New York Times.
Amazon additionally reached a settlement with Courtney Bowden, a warehouse employee in Pennsylvania, who alleged she was wrongfully terminated after advocating for sick pay for part-time staff, NBC News reported.
Amid the rise in warehouse and supply employee activism, Costa and Cunningham’s outspokenness represented a uncommon occasion of Amazon tech staff advocating for modifications on the firm.
Costa and Cunningham had been members of the worker advocacy group Amazon Staff for Local weather Justice, which pressed the corporate to do extra about its environmental impression. The group in 2019 wrote an open letter asking Amazon founder and Govt Chairman Jeff Bezos to undertake a complete local weather coverage, which was signed by greater than 8,700 workers. Later that yr, greater than 1,500 Amazon tech workers walked out in protest of its local weather stance.
In addition they pressured Amazon to vary the way it responds to staff who converse out towards its insurance policies.
After Amazon threatened to fireplace them for publicly critiquing its local weather stance, AECJ organized lots of of workers to deliberately violate the corporate’s company communications coverage.
Throughout the pandemic, Costa and Cunningham raised considerations about warehouse staff’ security. Each of them shared a petition from warehouse staff advocating for extra protections and offered to match donations up to $500 in assist of the trigger.
WATCH: Watch CNBC’s full interview with Amazon CEO Andy Jassy
Comments are closed.