White Home Chief of Employees Mark Meadows speaks to reporters following a tv interview, outdoors the White Home in Washington, October 21, 2020.
Alexander Drago | Reuters
The Supreme Court docket of South Carolina on Tuesday ordered former White Home chief of workers Mark Meadows to testify earlier than an Atlanta-area grand jury as a part of its investigation into former President Donald Trump’s efforts to intrude in Georgia’s 2020 election outcomes.
A panel of 5 justices unanimously affirmed a decrease courtroom decide’s order for Meadows to adjust to the subpoena from the Fulton County grand jury on Wednesday. Meadows had requested the state supreme courtroom to dam the subpoena.
However the justices rejected Meadows’ enchantment, writing in a short opinion, “We’ve got reviewed the arguments raised by Appellant and discover them to be manifestly with out benefit.”
A name for remark from Meadows’ lawyer, James Bannister, was not instantly returned.
The Fulton County grand jury, led by Atlanta District Legal professional Fani Willis, is conducting a legal investigation involving Trump’s push for Georgia election officers to undo his loss to President Joe Biden within the 2020 election.
On Jan. 2, 2021, 4 days earlier than Congress confirmed Biden’s victory, Trump known as Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and confused his have to “discover 11,780 votes” — a margin sufficiently big for Trump to win the state. Meadows had participated in that decision.
Raffensperger, a Republican, pushed again on Trump, who then attacked the Georgia official on social media.
In a movement to the South Carolina Supreme Court docket filed lower than two weeks earlier than his scheduled testimony date, Meadows’ lawyer questioned the legitimacy of the grand jury as a result of Georgia legislation doesn’t grant it the facility to criminally indict defendants.
The state supreme courtroom’s ruling got here one week after Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., one other shut Trump ally, testified earlier than the Georgia grand jury. Graham had requested the U.S. Supreme Court docket to quash the grand jury’s subpoena for his testimony, however his request was rejected.
This text was initially printed by cnbc.com. Learn the authentic article right here.