National News

Nirbhaya Case: Death Row Convict Claims Mental Illness In SC, Centre Says He Has Sound Mind

New Delhi: One of many 4 loss of life row convicts within the Nirbhaya gang rape and homicide case claimed within the Supreme Courtroom on Thursday that whereas rejecting his mercy plea the President didn’t think about his psychological sickness following torture in jail, an allegation denied by the Centre saying “he is fit and has sound mind”.

Vinay Sharma by means of his counsel made a last-ditch effort to flee from the gallows claiming that every one the related data weren’t introduced earlier than the President together with that he had been subjected to torture and ill-treatment in jail because of which he had developed psychological sickness.

The Centre, nevertheless, opposed his declare and produced a medical report dated February 12 which stated he was match and had a sound thoughts.

A bench of Justices R Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan and A S Bopanna, which reserved its order on Sharma’s plea difficult the rejection of his mercy petition by President stated it can pronounce the decision on Friday at 2 PM.

The highest courtroom additionally rejected Sharma’s counsel A P Singh’s request to peruse the unique file of advice made by the Lieutenant Governor and Delhi residence minister Satyendra Jain for rejection of his mercy petition.

“Though the Court has informed counsel that Home Minister of Government of NCT of Delhi and Lieutenant Governor have signed the proposal on the mercy petition, counsel insisted upon on looking into the original files. Request for perusal of the original files by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-Vinay Sharma is declined,” the bench stated in its order.

Singh contended that signatures of Delhi residence minister and LG weren’t obtained on the unique recordsdata recommending rejection of mercy petition of Sharma.

Solicitor Normal Tushar Mehta, showing for the Centre and NCT of Delhi, opposed the arguments of Singh and stated that signatures had been obtained on the unique recordsdata and submitted the paperwork for the perusal of the courtroom.

“The contention of Dr AP Singh, counsel appearing for the petitioner-Vinay Sharma, is that Home Minister of Government of NCT of Delhi and LG have not signed the recommendation rejecting the mercy petition of the petitioner and, therefore, counsel wanted to look into the original file and make submission on that aspect,” stated the bench.

It stated, “The concerned files have been produced before us which we have perused and on perusal it is seen that Home Minister of Government of NCT of Delhi and Lieutenant Governor have signed the same”.

The bench after rejecting the request of Singh requested him to proceed along with his arguments whereas making him clear that judicial evaluation of rejection of mercy petition by President has a really restricted scope and the courtroom has solely to see whether or not there was correct software of thoughts.

Singh stated that every one related supplies weren’t earlier than the President, who rejected the mercy petition inside 48 hours of submitting of the plea.

“The President did not consider that Sharma has been subjected to torture and ill-treatment in prison, as a result of which he experienced grave mental trauma and even developed mental illness for which he has received psychiatric treatment in prison,” Singh stated, including that psychological sickness is without doubt one of the floor to commute his loss of life sentence.

He stated that Sharma was additionally stored in solitary confinement by the jail authorities and subjected in-human remedy, which was towards the rules of apex courtroom.

Singh argued that there was historical past of bodily assaults on Sharma and his medical data set up the truth that he was taken for psychiatric remedy a number of instances.

Mehta opposed the arguments saying all due technique of legislation was adopted and browse out the file noting made by Union residence minister Amit Shah, on the advice despatched to the President which stated that his case fall in rarest of uncommon class and doesn’t deserve clemency.

Mehta stated that jail data counsel that he was not stored in solitary confinement.

The apex courtroom had earlier dismissed a plea filed by Mukesh Kumar Singh, one other loss of life row convict within the case, difficult the rejection of his mercy petition by the President.

The trial courtroom had on January 31 stayed “till further orders” execution of the 4 convicts within the case — Mukesh Kumar Singh (32), Pawan Gupta (25), Vinay Kumar Sharma (26) and Akshay Kumar (31), who’re lodged in Tihar Jail.

Pawan has not but filed a healing petition — the final and closing authorized treatment accessible to an individual which is set in-chamber. Pawan additionally has the choice of submitting a mercy plea.

The mercy petition of Akshay was additionally rejected by the President.

The 23-year-old physiotherapy intern, who got here to be often known as ‘Nirbhaya’ (fearless), was gang-raped and savagely assaulted on the evening of December 16, 2012, in a shifting bus in South Delhi. She died of her accidents a fortnight later in a Singapore hospital.

Six individuals together with the 4 convicts, Ram Singh and a juvenile — had been named as accused.

The trial of the 5 grownup males started in a particular fast-track courtroom in March 2013.

Ram Singh, the prime accused, allegedly dedicated suicide by hanging himself in Tihar jail days after the trial started. The juvenile, who was stated to be essentially the most brutal of the attackers, was put in a correctional residence for 3 years.

The juvenile was launched in 2015 and despatched to an undisclosed location amid issues over a risk to his life. He, when launched, was 20 years outdated.

(PTI)

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button