Sport News

If Ethics Officer thinks Dravid has conflict, it is his perception: CoA

New Delhi: Madhya Pradesh Cricket Affiliation (MPCA) life member Sanjeev Gupta writing to the Board of Management for Cricket in India (BCCI) Ethics Officer D.Ok. Jain on former cricketers being conflicted as per the brand new structure had virtually develop into a development. After choosing on Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly and V.V.S. Laxman, the most recent title Gupta zeroed in on was former India skipper Rahul Dravid. However the Committee of Directors (CoA) have lastly put their foot down and cleared Dravid of any battle on Tuesday.

Talking to IANS, a CoA member stated that the committee had already checked if the previous skipper was eligible to take over on the Nationwide Cricket Academy (NCA) and if the necessity arises, they are going to additional clarify to Jain how and why Dravid isn’t conflicted.

“If he thinks there is conflict that is his (Jain’s) perception. It is okay, we will respond to it. We had okayed Dravid’s appointment and we will inform the Ethics Officer on why and how it was cleared,” the member defined.

Whereas coming underneath the ambit of the Nationwide Anti-Doping Company (NADA) can be one thing that was anticipated to be mentioned on the assembly, the member stated that it was a matter that was executed and dusted.

“Whatever BCCI did earlier isn’t something that we are concerned about. The government asked us and we are citizens of the country and must follow the rules,” the member pointed.

However the transfer has been closely criticized by the BCCI officers.

“That is nothing however an admission of failure of administration on the a part of the BCCI CEO Rahul Johri and the CoA. The CEO will get paid an quantity upward of Rupees 5 crores an annum and has apparently been paid a bonus of about 5 crores or so too, however the administration underneath him has fully botched up the BCCI Anti-Doping program and particularly and spectacularly failed within the Prithvi Shaw matter.

“This step (to affix forces with NADA) could have been taken simply to keep away from an inquiry into the Shaw incident being instituted and being taken to its logical conclusion. The CEO can’t escape scrutiny on the mishandling and the choice makers can’t escape scrutiny on the mishandling on this complete episode together with this NADA enterprise,” the official had informed IANS.

“This is a decision of policy nature and the CEO was in no position to take such a call and also, there seems to be some false assurance being given to the government.”

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button