Amber Heard’s authorized crew alleges flawed juror was seated in Depp trial, says mistrial must be declared

The authorized crew for Amber Heard is asking for a mistrial to be declared within the defamation lawsuit involving Johnny Depp, alleging {that a} flawed juror was seated on the jury.

Heard’s authorized crew made the submitting on Friday afternoon, arguing that juror quantity 15 was not really the person who was summoned by the courtroom, and “couldn’t have correctly served on the jury at this trial.”

In accordance with the submitting, included within the “Jury Panel Listing” was a person who had a date of delivery in 1945, which means the person would have been 77 years previous in the course of the trial. Nevertheless, a person who’s 52 years previous and lives on the similar tackle because the 77-year-old was the one who appeared for jury obligation and sat on the jury, the submitting alleges.

“The person who appeared for jury obligation with this title was clearly the youthful one. Thus, the 52-year-old- sitting on the jury for six weeks was by no means summoned for jury obligation on April 11,” the submitting states.

AMBER HEARD ASKS COURT TO TOSS $10M VERDICT IN JOHNNY DEPP DEFAMATION CASE

Actress Amber Heard, proper, and her sister Whitney Heard, second left, depart the Fairfax County Courthouse on June 1, 2022 in Fairfax, Virginia. The jury within the Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard case awarded Depp $15 million in damages to his profession over an op-ed Heard wrote within the Washington Put up in 2018. (Picture by Rod Lamkey/Consolidated Information Footage)

Due to this alleged error, the authorized crew states that Heard’s due course of was “compromised” and a mistrial “must be declared.”

“Ms. Heard’s due course of was due to this fact compromised. Underneath these circumstances, a mistrial must be declared, and a brand new trial ordered,” the submitting states.

The submitting states that the “safeguards” apparently did not work on this occasion and the right identification of the juror wasn’t verified.

Former U.S. Legal professional Neama Rahmani informed Fox Information Digital that the allegation made by Heard’s authorized crew is “not grounds for a mistrial or for the decision to be overturned.”

Rahmani mentioned that the juror mix-up might have been “an harmless mistake, wherein case Heard’s argument will fail.”

“Even when it was intentional, her legal professionals should show that the juror misconduct would have resulted in a problem for trigger.  Which means the flawed juror couldn’t have been honest and neutral.  That’s a troublesome hurdle for them to beat,” Rahmani mentioned.

JOHNNY DEPP VERDICT: ACTOR WINS DEFAMATION CASE AGAINST EX-WIFE AMBER HEARD

Actor Johnny Depp smiles at followers following a break on the ultimate day of his defamation trial towards Amber Heard in Fairfax, Virginia, U.S., Might 27, 2022.  (Reuters/Evelyn Hockstein/File Picture)

“Fairfax County’s Juror Questionnaire webpage furthers this objective by requiring all County residents to login utilizing their 7-digit Juror quantity, Zip code, and ‘Delivery Date’… These safeguards are in place and relied upon by the events to confirm the identification of the right juror, to make sure due course of and a good trial for all litigants,” the submitting states.

The brand new submitting comes only a week after Heard’s authorized crew requested a choose to toss out the $10.35 million judgment made in favor of Johnny Depp, arguing that it wasn’t supported by the proof.

“The decision is extreme as a matter of regulation in mild of the proof and regulation, and must be put aside,” they wrote. 

The Virginia jury awarded the $10.35 million judgment to Depp on June 1, discovering that Heard, his ex-wife, defamed him and brought on him to overlook out on enterprise alternatives due to a Washington Put up op-ed written by her, wherein she described herself as a “public determine representing home abuse.” 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The American Civil Liberties Union helped actress Amber Heard draft the op-ed on the heart of Johnny Depp’s defamation lawsuit.  (Michael Reynolds/pool by way of Reuters)

Depp made claims that there have been three defamatory statements made within the op-ed, which embrace the heading calling Heard a survivor of sexual assault.

Heard succeeded in a countersuit towards Depp, successful $2 million on a declare alleging {that a} assertion made by Depp’s legal professional, Adam Waldman, to the media calling the allegations she made a “hoax” was libelous.

This text was initially revealed by foxnews.com. Learn the unique article right here.