Dharamsala: The continued army aggression throughout the Himalayas isn’t the primary by China and it received’t be the final. India by no means shared a border with China — it’s the Indo-Tibet border. Figuring out its strategic significance, India ought to think about the geopolitical significance of Tibet as one in all its core points.
These have been the views of Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) President Lobsang Sangay, globally often known as Prime Minister-in-exile, relating to a Himalayan border conflict between India and China that left 20 Indian troops lifeless earlier this month.
“China recognised Tibet as a core issue in terms of China’s national security and development since 2008, you know, for instance, the Chinese President Xi Jinping has been on the record to say China’s national security and stability depends on security and stability of Tibet,” Sangay, the youngest to move the government-in-exile, informed IANS in an unique interview right here on Saturday.
“That’s how Tibet is geopolitically important for China. Knowing the strategic significance of Tibet, India should consider the geopolitical importance of Tibet as one of its core issues,” he mentioned.
On China’s newest army aggression is simply the tip of the iceberg, the 51-year-old Harvard educated democratically elected CTA head, mentioned: “Ongoing China’s army aggressions throughout the Himalayas will not be the primary army aggression by China and it received’t be the final.
“As a matter of reality, India by no means shared a border with China, it’s the Indo-Tibet border. Tibet served as a zone of peace within the type of a buffer between India and China for greater than a thousand years in the past. At the moment, it’s not the case since China’s invasion of Tibet in 1950.
“By invading Tibet, China has militarized your entire Tibetan Plateau, which poses safety threats to Tibet’s neighbouring international locations. As an illustration, China’s army encroachment in Doklam in 2017, Ladakh and Sikkim are simply the tip of the iceberg.”
Toeing the trail adopted by Tibetan religious chief the Dalai Lama for years to resolve the difficulty of Tibet with China by way of the ‘middle-way approach’, Sangay described the violent army face-off and demise of the Indian troopers uncalled for.
“Final 70 years, we now have been saying that we study a lesson from Tibet’s expertise. When Tibet was occupied, Mao Zedong and Chinese language communist leaders strategised that Tibet is the palm and Ladakh, Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Arunachal are the five-finger.
“That is China’s strategic design to increase its expansionist coverage to South Asia. By invading Tibet the palm, now Chinese language troops are coming into these 5 fingers.
“On the similar time, China is placing stress on India’s rapid neighbours Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and the Maldives for encircling India to verify India’s existence in Asia,” Sangay mentioned.
On boycotting Chinese language items to take care of China economically, he mentioned Beijing is the manufacturing hub of the world and is the foremost buying and selling associate for a lot of international locations.
“I think collectively, countries must cut down their trade dependence on China. There are a lot of things that can be done on the government level, also I think celebrities are a major influencer when it comes to consumerism and therefore, they shouldn’t promote China-made products.”
“As I keep saying, a resolution for resolving the Tibet issue is making Tibet a peace zone,” he mentioned.
“Asia’s future cooperation and improvement rely upon the character of India-China relations. Having strong relations between China and India, Tibet concern should be resolved, it’s as a result of Tibet concern lies the centrality of China-India relations.
“Creating Tibet as a zone of peace in Asia is a win-win method. Having mentioned that, I see, the way forward for Asia relies on the Tibet concern,” Sangay was categorically clear in his saying.
On resolving the difficulty of Tibet with China by the CTA, Sangay, who’s on the helm for his second consecutive time period, believes in dialogue.
“As per our strategy as a concern, prepare for the worse and hope for the best. We hope for the best to resolve our issue as soon as possible, at the same time, if not, we prepare for the worst situation.”
In line with present India-China conflicts starting from border dispute to worldwide relations, he mentioned, “I see that our ‘middle-way approach’ is the best solution to resolve our issue as well as China-India’s conflict too”.
The ‘middle-way approach’, he mentioned, by way of dialogue with China is envisioned by His Holiness the Dalai Lama and adopted by the CTA.
For the reason that early 1970s, the CTA has pursued dialogue with the Chinese language authorities primarily based on the ‘middle-way approach’.
The worldwide help obtained for the Tibetan trigger has additional re-affirmed CTA’s dedication to the ‘middle-way approach’. China will obtain the worldwide standing it needs with its present path of coercion and army aggression and document of gross human rights violation.
The center-way method neither seeks separation from the Individuals’s Republic of China nor a excessive diploma of autonomy however real autonomy for all Tibetan individuals beneath a single administration in Tibet.
“To gain international legitimacy to China, I hope that Chinese leadership will realize how important it is soon,” an optimistic Sangay added.
UN & US Carefully Monitoring India-China Border Pressure
LAC Stand-Off: PM Modi Sends Robust Message To China