Apple Wins Court docket Ruling Throwing Out $308.5-Million Patent Verdict
Apple persuaded a federal choose to throw out a $308.5 million (roughly Rs. 2,298 crores) jury verdict it misplaced to a privately-held licensing agency for infringing a patent related to digital rights administration.
In a Thursday night time determination, US District Choose Rodney Gilstrap mentioned Personalised Media Communications LLC (PMC) deliberately delayed submitting its software with the US Patent and Trademark Workplace, hoping to acquire a bigger payout.
“This courtroom takes very severely the prospect of disturbing the unanimous verdict of a duly empaneled jury,” however PMC’s “deliberate technique of delay” was a “acutely aware and egregious misuse of the statutory patent system,” Gilstrap wrote.
PMC, based mostly in Sugar Land, Texas, claimed in its 2015 lawsuit that the FairPlay software program utilized in Apple’s iTunes service and App Retailer to decrypt motion pictures, music and apps infringed its patent obtained in 2012.
However the choose, who sits in Marshall, Texas, accepted Apple’s protection of “prosecution laches,” which might block a patent holder from imposing a patent after an unreasonable and unexplained delay. Gilstrap mentioned PMC’s delay lasted a few years.
Jurors had discovered Cupertino, California-based Apple liable to PMC on March 19, after a one-week trial.
“PMC respectfully disagrees with Choose Gilstrap’s ruling and plans to attraction,” its lawyer Douglas Kline of Goodwin Procter mentioned in an e-mail.
Apple didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark.
PMC’s patent software dated to functions filed within the 1980s.
Gilstrap mentioned PMC employed a so-called “submarine” patent technique, submitting serial functions after which maintaining its patent portfolio “hidden” till business extensively adopted the underlying know-how.
He mentioned PMC would demand licensing charges or allege infringement solely after it believed infringement was widespread.
A June 1 determination by the federal appeals courtroom dealing with patent circumstances made it simpler to problem submarine patents.
© Thomson Reuters 2021